Difference between revisions of "Open Data Initiatives"

From CityGML Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
imported>Karl-Heinz Haefele
imported>Karl-Heinz Haefele
Line 11: Line 11:
 
<th>Year</th>
 
<th>Year</th>
 
<th>Acquisition technique</th>
 
<th>Acquisition technique</th>
<th>Other thematic classes</th>
+
<th>Thematic classes</th>
 
<th>Textures</th>
 
<th>Textures</th>
 
<th>Notes</th>
 
<th>Notes</th>
Line 46: Line 46:
 
<td>2019</td>
 
<td>2019</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
<td>no</td>
+
<td>Building</td>
 
<td>no</td>
 
<td>no</td>
 
<td><nowiki>EPSG:4979</nowiki></td>
 
<td><nowiki>EPSG:4979</nowiki></td>
Line 58: Line 58:
 
<td>2010</td>
 
<td>2010</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
<td>Terrain</td>
+
<td>Building,Terrain</td>
 
<td>No</td>
 
<td>No</td>
 
<td>It contains terrain intersection curves</td>
 
<td>It contains terrain intersection curves</td>
Line 71: Line 71:
 
<td>2015</td>
 
<td>2015</td>
 
<td>Cadastre footprints + LiDAR</td>
 
<td>Cadastre footprints + LiDAR</td>
<td></td>
+
<td>Building</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
Line 96: Line 96:
 
<td>2011</td>
 
<td>2011</td>
 
<td>?</td>
 
<td>?</td>
<td></td>
+
<td>Building</td>
 
<td>No</td>
 
<td>No</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
Line 107: Line 107:
 
<td>2012</td>
 
<td>2012</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
<td>Terrain, water</td>
+
<td>Building, Terrain, Water</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
Line 118: Line 118:
 
<td>2009</td>
 
<td>2009</td>
 
<td>Photogrammetry</td>
 
<td>Photogrammetry</td>
<td></td>
+
<td>Building</td>
 
<td>Yes</td>
 
<td>Yes</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
Line 129: Line 129:
 
<td>2015</td>
 
<td>2015</td>
 
<td>Photogrammetry in combination with existing public 2(.5)D datasets</td>
 
<td>Photogrammetry in combination with existing public 2(.5)D datasets</td>
<td>Roads, lots, parks, water, terrain</td>
+
<td>Building, Roads, Lots, Parks, Water, Terrain</td>
 
<td>No</td>
 
<td>No</td>
 
<td>Very rich in attributes</td>
 
<td>Very rich in attributes</td>
Line 141: Line 141:
 
<td>2016</td>
 
<td>2016</td>
 
<td>Cadastre footprints + LiDAR</td>
 
<td>Cadastre footprints + LiDAR</td>
<td></td>
+
<td>Building</td>
 
<td>No</td>
 
<td>No</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
Line 163: Line 163:
 
<td>2011</td>
 
<td>2011</td>
 
<td>Cadastre footprints + LiDAR</td>
 
<td>Cadastre footprints + LiDAR</td>
<td>no</td>
+
<td>Building</td>
 
<td>no</td>
 
<td>no</td>
 
<td><nowiki>urn:ogc:def:crs,crs:EPSG:6.12:25833,crs:EPSG:6.12:5783</nowiki></td>
 
<td><nowiki>urn:ogc:def:crs,crs:EPSG:6.12:25833,crs:EPSG:6.12:5783</nowiki></td>
Line 175: Line 175:
 
<td>2010</td>
 
<td>2010</td>
 
<td>Cadastre footprints + LiDAR</td>
 
<td>Cadastre footprints + LiDAR</td>
<td></td>
+
<td>Building</td>
 
<td>Yes</td>
 
<td>Yes</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
Line 186: Line 186:
 
<td>2015</td>
 
<td>2015</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
<td>no</td>
+
<td>Building</td>
 
<td>no</td>
 
<td>no</td>
 
<td><nowiki>urn:adv:crs:ETRS89_UTM32*DE_DHHN2016_NH</nowiki></td>
 
<td><nowiki>urn:adv:crs:ETRS89_UTM32*DE_DHHN2016_NH</nowiki></td>

Revision as of 14:23, 1 February 2019

 Open Data Initiatives

Dataset Country Level of detail CityGML ver. Year Acquisition technique Thematic classes Textures Notes
Berlin Germany LOD2 2.0 2013 ? Terrain Yes Released in 2015
Brussels Belgium LOD2 1.0 2014 Building No EPSG:31370
BuildZero Open City Model United States LOD1 2.0 2019 Building no EPSG:4979
Den Haag Open Data Netherlands LOD2 1.0 2010 Building,Terrain No It contains terrain intersection curves
Hamburg Germany LOD1 and LOD2 1.0 2015 Cadastre footprints + LiDAR Building
Hannover Germany LOD1 and LOD2 2.0 2014 Building No ETRS89 (UTM), EPSG-Code 25832
Linz Austria LOD2 1.0 2011 ? Building No
Lyon France LOD2 2.0 2012 Building, Terrain, Water
Montréal Canada LOD2 1.0 2009 Photogrammetry Building Yes
New York City by TUM United States LOD1 2.0 2015 Photogrammetry in combination with existing public 2(.5)D datasets Building, Roads, Lots, Parks, Water, Terrain No Very rich in attributes
New York City by DoITT United States LOD2 (buildings are modeled with thematic surfaces in LOD2, however, for most buildings the geometric shape is LOD1) 2.0 2016 Cadastre footprints + LiDAR Building No
Nordrhein-Westfalen Open Data Germany LOD 1 and LOD2 2.0 2017 Cadastre footprints + LiDAR Building No urn:adv:crs:ETRS89_UTM32*DE_DHHN92_NH
Potsdam Germany LOD2 1.0 2011 Cadastre footprints + LiDAR Building no urn:ogc:def:crs,crs:EPSG:6.12:25833,crs:EPSG:6.12:5783
Rotterdam Netherlands LOD2 1.0 2010 Cadastre footprints + LiDAR Building Yes
Thüringen Germany LOD1 and LOD2 1.0 2015 Building no urn:adv:crs:ETRS89_UTM32*DE_DHHN2016_NH

If you are aware of open datasets which are not listed above please contact Filip Biljecki (NUS Singapore) or Karl-Heinz Häfele (KIT).

You might also be interested in sample CityGML data available on the CityGML website, datasets from the Netherlands automatically generated with 3dfier, and in procedurally generated CityGML models.

The quality of most of these dataset has been evaluated in a paper published in the proceedings of the 3D GeoInfo 2016 conference.